Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chin-Cheng Wu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 23:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chin-Cheng Wu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does he meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG independent of his company ArrowPoint (which is a redirect, it does not have an article of its own). I couldn't verify that it is. Boleyn (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of acquisitions of Cisco as my searches such as this and this found nothing outstanding to suggest good notability. The most notable coverage is for the Arrowhead-Cisco and some here and there but nothing particularly significant about him. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:44, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Hasn't received significant coverage. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 19:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - His company redirects to List of acquisitions by Cisco Systems but this BLP isn't even mentioned there so don't really see the point in redirecting ...., I know redirection is preferred but in this case it'd be utterly pointless. –Davey2010^Talk 23:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.