Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess.com (4th nomination)

Chess.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, discussion started by banned user

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The nominated article fails to comply with Wikipedia Policy on Reliable Sources as well as the Wikipedia General Notability Guideline. The subject does not have substantial coverage in reliable peer reviewed sources. While the article has many footnotes and alleged sources, an examination of the same reveals that the subject merely has many trivial and fleeting mentions in sources, yet not the substantial coverage required under Wikipedia policy. A plethora of trivial mentions are not the equal of even two reliable sources that cover the subject in a substantial manner. That is a distinction that got drowned out in past AFD discussions of this article. Jack55430 (talk) 04:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Bad faith nomination by banned user. MaxBrowne (talk) 04:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. This has been done before. Banned user is trying to get this page deleted. --ChessFiends (talk) 10:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 8. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep, even though winter is almost over. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.