Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chen Cheng-kuan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Svartner (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chen Cheng-kuan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to support notability Stvbastian (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and Taiwan. Stvbastian (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:NBADMINTON. --Iiii I I I (talk) 09:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the article fails basic critera WP:SPORTBASIC. Stvbastian (talk) 02:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly to Chen Yongrui, delete for lack of sources or actual description about the player. Just because they have won a Super 100 doesn't mean that it's guaranteed for there to be sources about them. The Troutinator - Slap me | 09:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 01:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP He has won Malaysia Masters, which is part of the BWF World Tours, which confers NOTABILITY based on WP:NBADMINTON

There is otherwise some trivial coverage e.g.

Dualpendel (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.