Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaz Rainey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 04:30, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chaz Rainey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional biography for a non-notable showbiz lawyer. Contested draftification; moved back to mainspace without improvements. Sources do not support WP:GNG, WP:NBIO or even WP:NPRODUCER as the films he has produced are not notable. The sources are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs in coverage of other subjects: ([1], [2], [3], [4]), affiliated, non-independent sources: ([5], [6], his own website); and an LA Times reference, but it's in the sponsored/business directory section, not independent news coverage ([7]). Nothing else found in BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Film, Law, and California. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources in the article don't support BLP/Basic notability, as they are either trivial mentions or are about cases he worked on. Nothing to support NPROF. I couldn't find anything useful on google and scholar searches other than an SSRN paper from his time at LSE with no citations. Oblivy (talk) 06:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.