Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatGPT Plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to ChatGPT. Consensus that the paid version is not sufficiently notable to have its own article; no consensus to keep this, and a reasonable consensus to redirect. (non-admin closure) Aszx5000 (talk) 09:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChatGPT Plus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ChatGPT Plus is a subscription service thta is not notable by itself, and should be merged into main ChatGPT article. Merge discussion was stale, with several editors supporting merge and one opposing, I redirected the article some time ago. Now it's reverted by an IP, with a comment: "no consensus reached; improper way to redirect - use WP:MERGEPROP to propose a merge and let an uninvolved person to close it. Artem.G was involved".

my messages copied from talk pages: "There is nothing unique in paid version, there is no pages for example for paid version of Duolingo or any other application. The article is a redundant stub that says that Plus costs 20$, has plugins, and is available in several countries (that's already outdated)."

"Redirected to the main page. Everything on the main page can be said about Plus service, and as a subscription service it doesn't require a separate page. Besides, ChatGPT got almost 7 million views in the last 30 days, and ChatGPT Plus got less than 6 thousand." (31 May 2023)

See Talk:ChatGPT_Plus and Talk:ChatGPT#Merge_of_ChatGPT_Plus. My rationale still stands, subscription service is not notable and thus should be redirected (there's nothing to merge). Artem.G (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Internet, and Software. Artem.G (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge back to the main article, there is nothing special about a paid version of the Chat service. Oaktree b (talk) 16:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and close for me, per WP:NOTBURO and WP:MERGECLOSE. But yeah, sure, let this run for the full 7 days and disallow recreation except with consensus to spinout. Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. While I err on the side of notability for major large language models, this isn't a model -- I mean, maybe it is, but it seems that OpenAI no longer deigns to tell us what the deal is with their products/releases, so there is not much for us to write about (or indeed, for anyone to write about). jp×g 03:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - No good reason for the spinout. I don't believe that there is any independent notability of the subject - that is, none independent of the parent subject. Nor is there anything much we can say about it to justify an article. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - As I argued in the original merge proposal, the premium service is so closely identified with the free version that the two are synonymous in common use. We don't have separate articles for any other free vs paid services I've been able to find. StereoFolic (talk) 02:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge i think there is nothing special about plus version of ChatGPT Kasra092 (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.