Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Ray
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep and cleanup Gnangarra 13:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seemingly non-notable American actress; a Google search for "Charlie Ray" turns up nothing but fan sites, some IMDB hits and trivia information about the actress. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 21:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. —Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 21:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google actually turns up over a million results for her. She's been in Law & Order, too. ― LADY GALAXY 01:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Remember that number of Google hits should not be used; she isn't the only Charlie Ray on the planet. Also, that's just one minor role which doesn't really make her notable. Oh, and I only see 54,300 hits... Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 01:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That's because he's using Google Canada! Well, IMDB says she's been in three other TV shows. ― LADY GALAXY 05:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. She had a starring role in a well-regarded film, reviewed here and here for example. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable enough; starred in well-regarded film Little Manhattan. --Funper (talk) 22:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Her performance as one of the leads in Little Manhattan, reviewed here on Metacritic, seems enough to keep the article. Metacritic provides a summary of ten published reviews of the movie, one of which appeared in the New York Times. EdJohnston (talk) 04:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless proper references from Reliable Sources are given in the article. NBeale (talk) 07:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.