Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamber of Computer Engineers of Turkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rlendog (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chamber of Computer Engineers of Turkey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. very limited coverage in turkish [1]. LibStar (talk) 07:44, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:Too limited covarege in Turkish ? This is a joke isn't it ? [2] There are 166000 Google hits. Is this too limited ? If this is limited what is not limited ? Besides the chamber is founded recently and the number of hits increases sharply.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GOOGLEHITS is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good, if too limited covarage is not the rationale than what is the rationale for tagging ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 15:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please read WP:N or WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's be serious. Goggle hits were used to prove that the topic was not notable. Well I showed that just the reverse is true by using the very same search engine.(It was 166000, now 167000). Certainly the topic is notable. It may need to be expanded. But that has nothing to do with deleting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What counts for notability is whether there is significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I only saw an old mention (from October 2011) in Cumhuriyet of the first steps to be taken, not enough to establish notability. Is there more? --Lambiam 16:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the article. Cumhuriyet wrote about the first steps. Now the chamber is founded and the computer engineers are isuued from Chamber of Electrical Engineers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This source has 31 .jpg images of newspaper articles about the recent decision to formally split the Computer Engineer's Chamber from the Electrical Engineer's Chamber. Unscintillating (talk) 22:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. That is more than enough to show notability. --Lambiam 22:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable topic in addition to being wp:notable as per WP:GNG. Unscintillating (talk) 02:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.