Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celon Pharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 13:32, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Celon Pharma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a pharmaceuticals company, sourced to their own site. The article makes bold claims, of the benefits of their new drug "for curing schizophrenia"; I can see a Reuters report, but that is essentially the company founder predicting a great future. Other than that, searches find stock price discussions and announcements about other drugs,falling under WP:CORPTRIV. Clearly a company going about its business (in a sector where caution is needed about repeating predictive claims), but I am not seeing the coverage of the company itself needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Medicine, and Poland. AllyD (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of notability. Additionally, the list of "developed drugs" is misleading; they are all generics. I₂Overcome ^talk 11:08, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - once I got rid of the promotional fluff in the article, it doesn't have anything left that reveals notability to fulfill WP:CORP. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 13:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no notable and promotional --Loewstisch (talk) 09:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very similar to one the other day which was also promotional. Lacks WP:SIGCOV in independent sources. Spartathenian (talk) 11:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.