Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Digest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A magazine with such a membership that's existed for seventy years or more is notable. Speedily kept: bad faith nomination. Drmies (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Digest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable based on sourcing. Herp Derp (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.