Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cascade Framework (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cascade Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. All sources are not independent (either code hosting services and author's Twitter) or are of exceptionally low quality (blog spam). Anton.bersh (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper (talk) 18:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The article reads more like a promotional puff piece than anything else.TH1980 (talk) 02:55, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.