Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cargo Logic Air

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst ✈ 01:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cargo Logic Air

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable airline that doesn't even exist. No ICAO, no IATA, apparently a single plane, no flights, no routes. No-brainer. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 22:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 23:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 23:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 23:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now perhaps as this is questionably notable for the applicable guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now, anybody that charters a Boeing 747-8 is not a backyard outfit, it appears to be waiting for operating and route licences and clearly exists. MilborneOne (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Have edited the page and added more sources and also the official website of the company that all note that the airline is awaiting its AOC from the CAA. Mumrik1985 (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional keep I see a number of references that are not reliable. Care must be taken regarding the sources used when creating new pages.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.