Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CameraLK (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CameraLK

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING and it failed to WP:COMPANY and WP:SIRS. The article is full of introduction and own history and it does not say about Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.. There are many shops like this in Sri Lanka and we are not going to create article for them. JusticeForce101 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. – The Grid (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
what is the point Second nomination!!!! I don't know what is your point. You said they are promotional. But you should know there was a previous discussion went on about this article. And the ADMINS accepted that it is ok. How they did that? By looking at the sources. So, if you have any direct conflict and angry with me, tell me that straight. Because, this is not acceptable. OR you might have any conflict with those persons. I think you are a Sri Lankan. But, this is totally unacceptable to re-nominate the deletion tag again. It is not promotional: "Said by previous admins". That is why it is there in wiki main space.

Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The last AFD in June ended in no consensus. Geschichte (talk) 09:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It's just a retailer like others many shops in Sri Lanka. What is the notability? --JusticeForce101 (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this was discussed only a few months ago and kept and it hasn't changed significantly since then. I see no reason A) for it to be nominated again so soon and B) no reason for it to be nominated. This actually appears to be a bad faith nomination on behalf of the OP for a content dispute on another article. Canterbury Tail talk 13:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a bad-faith nomination per Canterbury Tail.dudhhr_Contribs 14:26, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.