Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calligraphism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Calligraphism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From my research, this is a non-existent term, claimed to be a genre of Italian film. No sources provided, I was unable to find an external definition for the term nor any films classified as such either on Google searches, GNews, IMDb or English and Italian Wikipedias. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 16:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As of now, it apparently is a tag in an Italian movie database. Google (Calligraphism -font) doesn't turn up anything useful, and the article itself doesn't have any references. WP:V and WP:N apply. --Pgallert (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neoligism. Searches for "Calligraphism" and "Calligrafi films" return wiki-mirrors. The article's first sentence attempts to define Calligraphism, as "Calligrafi films are novel adaptations" and the rest of the unsourced article uses OR to further define the term by describing a perhaps representative film. While "Calligraphy films" are a phenomena and phrase with some usage within filmmaking, the specific word "Calligraphism" is not. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:11, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.