Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COQOS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COQOS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already deleted once today. Recreated by same ed Roxy the dog. bark 15:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 16:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although the promotional language has mostly been removed, there is an obvious COI (see history of user page). Deb (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 06:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a product. Aside from the two speedy-deletions of previous instances here, there was a previous deletion of a redirect-only page on the vendor, and pages on the product and its vendor have previously been deleted on the German Wikipedia. As to the product's notability, searches return various routine announcements and there are the two referenced brief items summarising the configuration that the firm have recently been demonstrating. I don't think these are enough at this time to indicate attained encyclopaedic notability, by WP:PRODUCT or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:MILL, as there is not enough differentiation shown between this product and other products.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.