Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COLD (Computer Output to Laser Disk)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Computer Output to Laser Disc. The history has been deleted because, as well as being an unnecessary content fork with no new information, it was a blatant copyright violation of its only source. ~ mazca talk 19:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- COLD (Computer Output to Laser Disk) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No context given, no assertion of notability Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 23:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/
merge. Please take another look at WP:ATD and WP:BEFORE, particularly at the part that states: "when nominating an article for deletion due to sourcing or notability concerns, make a good-faith attempt to confirm that such sources aren't likely to exist". 373 results at Google News, 177 results on Google Books, 144 results on Google Scholar and a number of immediately seen sources like this, this or this firmly indicate that the subject meets both WP:N and WP:V. The real problem with the page is that it seems to be an unintentional content fork from Computer Output to Laser Disc, and, according to WP:CFORK, pages with duplicate content must be merged. — Rankiri (talk) 23:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: It looks to be copied from the reference provided in the article, thus it appears to be a copyright violation - Dlrohrer2003 05:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I still suggest to redirect to Computer Output to Laser Disc as a possible search term. — Rankiri (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Computer Output to Laser Disc since it's a content fork. --Cybercobra (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.