Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CODA System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ per WP:HEY. No support for deletion beyond nominator in light of improvements. (non-admin closure) Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CODA System

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Weak Keep The article has two references, each of which are to a mention on a single page of a book from 2001 and 2011 respectively. Not enough to pass WP:GNG. Amended to weak keep per WP:HEY and Guinness323 edits Flip^and Flopped ツ 00:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Flipandflopped do the improvements help? BOZ (talk) 04:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added two reviews from international magazines that specifically talk about the CODA System as the reason that Decipher's Lord of the Rings game was worth playing. Guinness323 (talk) 22:45, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well done finding these sources, but I'm not convinced that this meets WP:SIGCOV. All of this could just be merged to the article for the LOTR roleplaying game. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 23:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the improvements made by Guinness323. BOZ (talk) 23:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep would have considered a Delete however Guinness323 did great work and now this article should be kept. Great work. Iljhgtn (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.