Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CKod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:57, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CKod

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Impossible to tell from article whether it's notable, but a web search on the pretty distinctive name turns up nothing. Looks like a trivial programming exercise, if not a joke, though the links provide so little information (no documentation, no source code (sort of needed for GPL licensed software), no version history, no link to programmer's web site) that it's impossible to say. The actual web site has minimal functionality, minimal anything really. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

note It was previously prodded but that was removed without giving a reason by an editor making their one and only edit. I also tried prodding it before noticing it had already happened.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Random sourceforge project with no evidence of independent notability. Google scholar turns up zilch. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Poorly-written article, but I like the idea of Wikipedia being a knowledge repository of weird technical projects. Is it a fork of Kod?--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 05:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- definitely not. It may be a fork of something but without being able to see the (GPL??) code it's hard to tell. Curiously searching for 'ckod source code' turns up the repository for Kod, but that's probably Google trying a closest name match as source for Ckod or anything about it cannot be found.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 06:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.