Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Pearson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:31, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Pearson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a person of note Gorginhanson (talk) 21:54, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 August 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This page does not exist, has not existed since 2009, and is SALTed. Please close this AFD. Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 23:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:22, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Squeeps10: not sure why you think this page doesn’t exist, but it does. Why do you think it should be deleted? Mccapra (talk) 05:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: The AFD was originally transcluded with the placeholder "PageName". I have stricken the above comment. Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 15:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Squeeps10: ok great thanks for explaining. Mccapra (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep perhaps the best argument for deletion of this article would be WP:ONEEVENT, but looking through the content and sources there seems to be enough here for WP:GNG. Also there is no rational put forward by the nominator, so it is hard to know what they are arguing against. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.