Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHI Records
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. WP:A7, possible WP:G3. There is no obvious indication that this record label, or the people alleged to have run it, actually existed. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CHI Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references. Doesnt seem to exist any more. Not obviously notable Rathfelder (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SJK (talk) 10:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I couldn't verify that it ever existed, it seems unlikely. Peter James (talk) 21:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: as this article has no claim of importance of the subject. Toddst1 (talk) 22:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.