Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDS Invenio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MuZemike 23:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CDS Invenio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it's used to manage hundreds of thousands of papers on particle physics: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/. I would hold onto it. I also found some Google News articles from around 2005-06 if you search for 'CDSware'. Leoniceno (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The software is indeed used a lot, but no significant coverage (under either name) is available through Google searches. If good indications of notability (not popularity) can be provided, the article can of course be kept. Fram (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Leoniceno. I also listed it for rescue. --Mokhov (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I am a new editor, but article does not seem to be sourced well. My search did not produce much result.Editor for hire (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC) — Editor for hire (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Weak keep per Leoniceno. B.Rossow ^talk_contr 14:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.