Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDBurnerXP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Good job, Jethrobot. SL93 (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CDBurnerXP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found a bunch of trivial mentions in Google Books and Google Scholar, but nothing that would make this pass WP:N. SL93 (talk) 13:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - found (and referenced) an Editor's review in cnet. That should indicate other reliable sources are out there. --Ritchie333 (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.

Keep. This is a borderline case, but a cnet review is substantial coverage, and this is consumer software. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- But that is not multiple sources. SL93 (talk) 19:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This piece of software has a few other sources like this one from an Italian software reviewing website, this one from a Vietnamese website, and this one from a Spanish website. All provide what I would call significant coverage, even beyond the CNet article. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.