Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CADprofi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CADprofi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The AfD decision in April 2011 looked decisive, but the article appears to have continued through a subsequent overturned G4. There are a couple of pieces of Closeupmedia copy in mid-2012 but I am not seeing anything to contradict the April 2011 decision; it still appears to fail WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 07:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 04:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.