Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C++ inverse matrix code

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be restored if somebody really wants to transwiki it. Sandstein 07:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C++ inverse matrix code

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a good-faith contribution by a new user, but its only content is source code. It is therefore unencyclopedic. Rilak (talk) 23:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki wikibooks or wikiversity seem like a good idea. Wikiversity can use it in a math or programming topic. Wikibooks can use it in C++ programming. 184.144.166.85 (talk) 05:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's not really an encyclopedia article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and do not transwiki – producing a good algorithm for matrix inversion (with high precision and good stability for ill-conditioned matrices) is a notoriously difficult problem. The code I see here gives me no reason for confidence. Good and thoroughly tested algorithms are freely available (see LAPACK++; use LUFactorizeIP followed by LaLUInverseIP); they are considerably more complex than what we have here. --Lambiam 00:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wikibooks/Wikiversity. I compiled the code and it appears to work properly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.