Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byzantine complexity
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Byzantism. Should anyone see anything worth merging, the article history is still there. Michig (talk) 08:45, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Byzantine complexity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dictionary definition. Zero references Openlydialectic (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NAD. Can think of no encyclopedic topic to merge or redirect to. Cnilep (talk) 01:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Cnilep: Byzantinism might work. Take a look at the second paragraph in the lede. Openlydialectic (talk) 02:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This is an alternate definition of the word Byzantine; "Byzantine complexity" isn't generally used as a multi-word phrase. With no sourcing (since 2004), I don't see how this can be kept; perhaps a soft-redirect to Wiktionary is called for. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Byzantinism, which should mention the dictdef. A one-sentence definition is all that needs to be merged. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect to Byzantinism. Agree with the logic above, but with no sources whatsoever, there's nothing to merge. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.