Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BulletProof FTP Server

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BulletProof FTP Server

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable FTP program. MBisanz ^talk 00:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per A7. Tarheel95 (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All that I can find for significant coverage is this. Joe Chill (talk) 20:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Via a simple search I could find a lot of references on the google of this type:

http://ftp-software-review.toptenreviews.com

http://download.cnet.com/BulletProof-FTP-Server/3000-2160_4-10065912.html

There were a few references on google scholar as well. This is one of the oldest ftp software available. Pxtreme75 (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non notable software. The C|Net link has no review, just the publisher's info, and I don't think the http://ftp-software-review.toptenreviews.com or the link Joe found count as significant coverage. --Nuujinn (talk) 01:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.