Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BuildZoom (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 07:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BuildZoom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on a non notable private business; significant RS coverage to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Much of the article is details on the various research that the company published, but I don't believe that's sufficient in establishing notability and authoritativeness of the company as a source. Has been previously deleted via AfD (Oct 2016) and via CSD (Nov 2017). K.e.coffman (talk) 03:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 04:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Again. Per nom, advertisement, no significant coverage. James (^talk/_contribs) 19:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, fails WP:SPIP WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.