Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brijendra Pratap Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 20:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brijendra Pratap Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed. Despite the assertions on the talkpage it is almost inconceivable that this is not an autobiography. This notwithstanding, the subject of the article clearly does not meet WP:ANYBIO and the brief interview in Der Freitag does not amount to level of public exposure required for any kind of mention on Wikipedia. Equally, his connection with Save Women, Save India is irrelevant for the purposes of demonstrating his notability in this biographical article. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 18:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

" The notability is not challenged as the person is known by more than thousands of people for his movement." 103.243.55.20 (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC) — 103.243.55.20 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete - fails WP:42. The movement is notable, but notability is not inherited. Bearian (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"The article should be kept as the movement inspiration and people associated to it has to be acknowledged so that people might get a suitable leadership. It's not about notabilitity, it's about erasing the polluted system and to provide it a face. The politicians are coloring it with their statements, we should avoid it by giving the right people his right place in present."103.243.55.20 (talk) 07:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~" The article should be kept as the movement inspiration and people associated to it has to be acknowledged so that people might get~~I have moved the above text to where I believe the commenting IP wanted it. 220 of ^Borg 07:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Above post is totally irrelevant. It suggests they are merely trying to promote the organisation. Highly POV "erasing the polluted system". etc 220 of ^Borg 08:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Without more sources to prove WP:notability, this BLP should go--220 of ^Borg 08:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.