Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigitte Fitzgerald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Ginger Snaps (film). (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brigitte Fitzgerald

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page has multiple issues which had already been stated at the top of the page. In need of expansion, but the character does not seem notable enough to have its own page. I'm open in discussing its name as a redirect to the Ginger Snaps in light of its possible deletion. – Itsirlpidge (talk) 01:32, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Itsirlpidge (talk) 01:32, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fictional elements, and Canada. jolielover♥talk 02:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and/or redirect. We do not need a standalone "biography" of every individual character in every film that ever existed. Especially when they're written almost entirely WP:INUNIVERSE with just a single very short "cultural impact" passage for real-world context — and even more especially when even that section is really just reiterating a general theme of the movie as a whole, with no content whatsoever about any discernible impact or significance of the character in her own right. The amount of sourcing here just ain't cutting it, either. Bearcat (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ginger Snaps per Bearcat - The current article is largely just retellings of the plot summaries of each of the films, with a single sentence of "analysis". While searches do turn up sources on the character, these are in the context of discussions of the themes and analysis of the movie(s) as a whole which would be better covered on those film's pages, rather than the kind of sources that would justify a split into a separate character article. As a valid enough search term, redirecting to the main film page is a good WP:ATD. Rorshacma (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.