Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brig (C++ libraries)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:57, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brig (C++ libraries)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. I'm not sure how exactly notability would be established for this (probably no one is writing news articles about open-source C++ libraries), but the only reference is a primary source. Jc86035 (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 03:26, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unknown library, repo seems to have died with google code, I can't find an alternative anywhere. In fact, I can't find anything about it at all. User seems to be trying to advertise their stuff, including some other "bark" library in their user space. Isa (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't even notice that; the author's only 28 edits are to this article and their sandboxes, and almost no one else has ever edited the article. It definitely looks like advertising. Jc86035 (talk) 07:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTPROMO, WP:NOTMANUAL, WP:V, WP:N, choose any three. Bakazaka (talk) 23:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.