Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break the Safe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Break the Safe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. (I should've mentioned this earlier, but if this gets deleted, could someone please move Break the Safe (game show) here?) Laun chba ller 08:36, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Rush rush rush, The content has just been hacked. maybe give time for contributers to respond. Gregkaye (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly that the diff does not go to to this edit. I've removed all of it because Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.--Laun chba ller 10:03, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't speak German, but [1] appears to be reliable coverage (I can read the review with an on-line translation, but I have a harder time judging the quality of the source). I suspect a German speaker would be able to find more... Hobit (talk) 19:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Non notable game, The only one I know is this crappy one –Davey2010 • (talk) 06:23, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 14:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing to satisfy the GNG. I've looked at the German page cited by Hobit, and I don't think it qualifies as a reliable source in the WP meaning of the term. The site hosts game reviews by (apparently) amateur reviewers—the one who reviewed this game is identified on the site's contact page as a mechanical engineer. No different from a book review on Goodreads or Amazon in my opinion. Deor (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.