Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Box (character)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Logan's Run (1976 film). History not retained as nothing sourced to merge. Cirt (talk) 18:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Box (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its film. Without non-trivial coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 16:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or weak merge the "How Box came to be" section into Logan's Run (1976 film) (it's unfortunately unsourced, hence the "weak"). No point of an article for a one-time character. – sgeureka t•c 21:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or at least redirect. Perhaps the section in the film article on him could be expanded by a line or two--the same part as selected by sgeureka. ("weak merge" is a concept unknown to either afd or WP:merge, unless, analogous to week keep, it means "merge, but I'm not going to argue strongly for it" I think it's intended to mean merge, while first deleting the original content. I don't think that's an option under GFDL. Or does it mean, merge just a little of the content? That's reasonable enough, except the article talk page is the place to decide (I know, I just talked here about what part to merge myself, but sometimes it's necessary in order to explain why a merge is preferred. But no afd decision can be binding on content of an article.) DGG (talk) 22:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as Box was actually one of the best things in that film, next to Peter Ustinov's role. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Logan's Run (1976 film). Nothing cited; nothing to merge. Stifle (talk) 17:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.