Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Border Inn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. No sourcing to satisfy the GNG discussed. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Border Inn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Motel that fails WP:NBUILDING, other than a cute fact that the motel is in both Nevada and Utah, I don't see anything else significant about this motel. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Nevada and Utah. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Architecture, Business, and Travel and tourism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are lots of books that have this, mainly travel guides to the Great Basin National Park; but conversely none of them has very much about this. It's not in-depth coverage individually or in aggregate, as the books largely all say the same few things. Many books have less than the article at hand, not least because the article at hand claims that this is unique and the books wisely do not; as in fact there are places in the world where international borders go through the middles of buildings, not simply state borders going in between the different buildings of a single business. The uniqueness claim is unverifiable because this is not as special as one might think and the travel guide writers probably know that. Uncle G (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- What a singular argument, Uncle G. I'll put my bolded delete right here so a closing admin can do the proper thing--with an article that really should have been PRODded at some point in the last 19 years. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the hotel clearly fails GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 02:31, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.