Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombshock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Micromasters. Sandstein 09:03, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bombshock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character that does not appear to have significant third-party sources to assert notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to Micromasters, as the character is a minor character in the fiction, but he is mentioned on that page too. Mathewignash (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 19:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge seems reasonable to revert to the old state and try working on it as a broader topic. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Micromasters: The fictional character and toy does not meet the general notability guideline. However, the article provides some referenced and I believe that the article title is a plausible search term, so a merge seems the most logical option. Jfgslo (talk) 23:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.