Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Senturion
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 October 26. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:55, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blue Senturion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 18:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. High on plot details, low on notability and sources. Stifle (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge, depending on what's the status of other characters. Stifle,I notice this time you worded things a little relatively, so I assume you think this one might have some possibilities? DGG (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If anything in the article was cited, I would. Stifle (talk) 13:20, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- raven1977 (talk) 21:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks coverage in reliable sources, and since that is the case, coverage of this character shall be covered in no article at all. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 22:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No coverage in reliable third part sources so not notable. RMHED (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.