Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BlueXephos
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:21, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- BlueXephos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined CSD A7. However there may be notability issues but I feel more opinions are needed. I have no stance on the article itself and just doing this procedurally. Kwsn (Ni!) 21:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: one other thing though, if it is kept, it will have to be rewritten rather hardcore. Kwsn (Ni!) 21:08, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm unable to find any reliable sources for this. Pburka (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a preliminary search shows no notability or reliable sources whatsoever. OSborn arfcontribs. 03:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was the one who tagged it as A7. Youtube is not a claim of significance. →Στc. 20:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Reads like self-promotion, no evidence of notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. Do not have time to source this out as much as I would like, but "Yogscast" generated 1.4 million Google hits. That alone makes me think there might be something here. Regardless, it must be rewritten and is unsuitable to remain in its current form. Trusilver 00:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm a fan of Yogscast, but as an article this fails WP:N. -- Euryalus (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Question. If you are familiar with this Yogcast, maybe you are the one the be in the best position to find sources for it if it is actually sourcable? So many google hits make me think there must be something out there. Trusilver 02:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.