Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitInstant
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Charlie Shrem. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BitInstant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another short lived bit coin company with next to no coverage outside (rewritten, business as usual) press releases. One WP:INTERVIEW in New York Magazine and the rest of coverage is worse... Creator was of course a likely paid and undisclosed SPA. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Charlie Shrem, whose arrest supplies all the third-party notability here - David Gerard (talk) 09:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete TechCrunch aside, all other reliable, independent, significant coverage seems to be about the founder. Redirect seems appropriate. Pegnawl (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.