Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BioSapien

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sources on the page and in a WP:BEFORE do not add up to WP:ORGCRIT. Declined through AfC then moved to mainspace by submitter so would be opposed to dratifying. CNMall41 (talk) 03:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Medicine, United Arab Emirates, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I found a brief mention in Bloomberg obviously it is not enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Gheus (talk) 06:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on a biotech start-up, previously draftified and rejected at AFC, then moved into mainspace by the article creator, which leaves AFD as the remaining option. The article text largely covers financial fundraising, which falls under WP:CORPTRIV, product features, and the company founder's inclusion on award lists - again insufficient for the firm's notability. That leaves the content about the company's products, and here we need to be cautious about claims for the potential of new medical devices. Overall, I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 12:22, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I moved this article to drafts on 17 March 2025. It was put back into the main space without any real improvements. It clearly fails the WP:NCORP standards. Charlie (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]