Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Binbot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Binbot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable newsreader. Only coverage I can find for Binbot is totally unrelated (and adorable!) about a robot made of bins. Fails GNG. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Has been tagged for notability concerns since 2012. The company appears to have gone out of business. The lack of 3rd party references means that it failed to establish notability. I found nothing useful. Fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 17:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly an article that fails to pass WP:CORP due to the lack of references/independent sources/coverage and thus should be deleted. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 16:33, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.