Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bin There Dump That

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bin There Dump That

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources are either own web-site, directly affiliated or direct from the key players in the company with direct quotes in the source. No source that is interdependent of the company and speaks about the company. Appears to be a promo job created immediately auto-confirmed status is attained Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.