Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BillMonitor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BillMonitor

Delete-This appears to be more advertising then encyclopeadic. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep While a little spammy, the guardian article certainly does give significant coverage to this site. Corpx (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete INsufficient notability. Coverage is not substantial enough to warrant inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Could be cleaned up and seems to be noteworthy. REALLY needs a clean-up though. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:17, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak delete~~ Keep it is using inappropriate propaganda in which makes the article spammy. If it gets cleaned up, maybe I'll go with a stay. Zoo Fari 02:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup: Coverage is significant for a website. Need for cleanup is not reason for deletion. Mr_pand [talk | contributions] 07:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has already been cleaned up by 85.189.230.234 and 94.194.129.238. WP:CORP is established by this article from The Guardian and this article from the BBC. Cunard (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.