Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bill.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally prodded by me with the following rationale, which I believe is still valid: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) requirement". It was deprodded by the creator, who added a few sources (unfortunately, I don't think they are sufficient to change the situation), and an argument that the article is useful at Talk:Bill.com, which unfortunately is a classic example of an argument listed at WP:USEFUL (arguments not to use in deletion debates). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:11, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 20:21, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There does appear to be enough reliable sources to establish WP:GNG for this company. For example, these articles were recently published: Lee, Danielle (27 October 2014). "Bill.com Partners with Intuit to Benefit QB ProAdvisors". Accounting Today. Retrieved 18 November 2014. and Oliver, Blake (27 October 2014). "Harvard, MIT and $100,000 in Free Consulting: How One Accounting Firm Plans to Hit Aggressive Growth Goals". CPA Practice Advisor. Retrieved 18 November 2014. --I am One of Many (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.