Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly Hope Atkinson
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Beverly Hope Atkinson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
IMDB is not a reliable source. Need more evidence of notability. -- φ OnePt618Talk φ 04:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment How about this?This brief mention in the New York Times took about three seconds to locate. Subject has done stage, film and television for decades. The article needs work, not deletion. Evalpor (talk) 07:01, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The evidence toward notability is in the Find sources above. That they are not IN the article is a reason to add them, as they are available... but not to delete because someone else had not done so. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nobody else getting to it? Okay... I'll work on it myself. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:26, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Actress on many TV shows in the 60's and 70's, including Sanford and Son. I think having been on Sanford and Son is enough to keep the article. Sanford and Son was a great show and everyone on the show should have an article, especially Aunt Esther. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 02:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]
- We do have an article about Aunt Esther in addition to the article about LaWanda Page who played that character. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be a terrible shame if Wikipedia didn't have an article on Esther. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 03:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]
- What does Aunt Esther have to do with this nomination? (By the way, Nighteen Nightmares, consider reading WP:INHERITED.) Erpert (let's talk about it) 17:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It would be a terrible shame if Wikipedia didn't have an article on Esther. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 03:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.