Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertram Heribertson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mkativerata (talk) 20:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bertram Heribertson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ENT. one major role but not multiple notable roles to satisfy WP:ENT. LibStar (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added a filmography to the article, but as Swedish television and Swedish actors do not often get covered in English sources, this AFD definitely needs input from Swedish Wikipedians better able to find and translate Swedish sources. I'd hate it if he falls under the bus due to WP:UNKNOWNHERE. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Double down delete. This is a BLP article which lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. I know that in some rare instances (seiyu, rappers, musicians) we make exceptions to this rule of thumb, but that certainly doesn't mean that we should. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 00:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I feel that my initial concerns have been resolved. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 13:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And continue improvements. After spending some time with a Swedish-English dictionary and translating some sources, I was able to add them to the article. Seems the gentleman also has coverage for his multiple stage performances. Definitely needs some Swedish input. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 11:10, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Our English version is now certainly far better sourced than the equivalent article over at the Swedish Wikipedia. Apparently sourcing is of far less of a concen over there... but hey.. with a little work, it's do-able. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Perhaps not a very major actor, but has appeared in some (at least in his home country) quite well-known productions. Tomas e (talk) 10:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree that the English version is now better than the Swedish one. Excellent work! If no Swedish Wikipedian has taken an interest, it's probably because there are so many articles to deal with, and not enough Swedish Wikipedians. The major concern right now is that he's disappeared from the article about the TV series he starred in, which is why the article is now orphaned. I have sorted that out, at least. I could, ideally, improve the Swedish article about him, but I can't promise to do it any time soon, I'm afraid. Wilma Sweden (talk) 11:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.