Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behaviour Composer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Behaviour Composer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Conspicuous lack of reliable independent sources. Guy (Help!) 01:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only secondary source that is independent of the subject itself, is not about the subject. It is a book source that addresses Game Maker. —Codename Lisa (talk) 04:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It just got worse: Someone added six more self-published papers. —Codename Lisa (talk) 09:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Some sources just got added. All are written by Ken Kahn, who is associated with the project, so all fail the test of independence. Guy (Help!) 09:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! Edit conflict! I just mentioned it above. I think I'll let it be. —Codename Lisa (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.