Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrix Mine Sports Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:47, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrix Mine Sports Complex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is completely unnotable. The only mention from a news source I could really find is a snippet from a small newspaper (https://issuu.com/ncexpress/docs/expresses_20140917/7). The article is also about a location within a location that doesn't even have an article itself. The article is also unsourced and an orphan. There hasn't really been any significant additions to the article since its creation. But like I said, most importantly, it fails notability requirements. Gaismagorm (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Football, and South Africa. Gaismagorm (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, forgot to include the deletion category when nominating with twinkle, if someone knows how to add that, doing so would be very helpful :) Gaismagorm (talk) 18:42, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's an easy enough fix with the deletion sorting tool I use (and in any case only involves changing the parameter of {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}} — sorting these categories any other way adds the category to more pages than intended; I had to clean that up in another nomination yesterday). (No opinion on this article.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I checked, and it looks like it was sorted into a category. Thanks for the cool gadget suggestion though! Gaismagorm (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails in WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 15:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a run of the mill stadium, of which there are too many unsourced stubs. Bearian (talk) 23:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.