Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BattleTech technology (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to BattleTech#Technology. Stifle (talk) 18:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- BattleTech technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is only supported by primary sources. It describes a fictional world in primarily in-universe sources. While BattleTech is notable, there is no particular evidence for notability of the technology of the fictional universe. --Craw-daddy | T | 18:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. --Craw-daddy | T | 18:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 19:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per WP:N. Monterey Bay (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - All in-universe material, much duplicated and needing to be cut down. Don't delete outright. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge all salvageable information, probably to BattleTech#Technology. Non-notable on its own, but probably a core part of the franchise given it's sci-fi. Ansh666 06:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.