Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bateman Pulsed Column

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bateman Pulsed Column

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Promotional Rathfelder (talk) 15:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per {{Db-g11}}. Beagel (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Promotional, unreferenced, and sourceless apart from the company. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.