Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic Global English

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:27, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Basic Global English

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like an advertisement. Only one secondary source, however the reliability of the source is in question (referring to "The Linguist" issue 48.2). ~~ Sintaku ^Talk 00:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This sounds similar to English as a lingua franca, but I gather the movements are distinct. I'm not convinced this satisfies WP:GNG on its own, as it appears that most of the work is attributable to Joachim Grzega. A selective merge to International English might be warranted, though. Cnilep (talk) 04:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 04:41, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.