Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bas Vodde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Bas Vodde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A BLP article with notability not demonstrated and no independent sources Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably. In a Google Books search, there are some indications (in books of which he is not an author) of notability in the TDD and agile development field, e.g. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=HbRo4kYnTnMC. So a possible case for an article about an author, but needs de-puffing. Mcewan (talk) 23:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unsourced BLP articles should deleted per WP:BLPDELETE. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 06:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.