Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balram Shri Krishna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Ponyo (mass deletion of pages added by Akash Guhathakurta). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balram Shri Krishna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film Wgolf (talk) 03:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AKA:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: another pre-internet early Hindi film. Not unsourcable and part of the historical record. I'll await input from Hindi-reading Wikipedians and not judge from current state. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-Part of this is due to a bit of possible SPI that has been going on which is why this is on the AFD actually. Wgolf (talk) 04:39, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The poor noob author. If not a sock, the sheer number of deletion tags from you on his talk page is not exactly welcoming. Whew. Do you have a link to any investigation? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – For reference, see WP:INDAFD and this search: Balram Shri Krishna. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-I didn't realize I did that many, feel bad I did. I seem to have more troubles with some of these articles from countries like that though from those users...I don't mind obscure films coming in to be honest though. And the other problem is though the refs are unreliable and I have sent them notices about it. Wgolf (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj Wgolf (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The investigation lists him only as "suspected" of being part of a "paid editing ring"... though who is going to rich on articles for 50 year old Hindi films? I would think that if any established editor wishes any of these userfied to them for continued work, we'd be okay with that. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:30, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.